🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to remove Black history and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.