🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."